I was reading an article on a hacker who got off without being convicted for infecting a million computers and causing millions of dollors in damage.  The Article was named Autistic Hacker Escapes Penalty. This really bugs me as the reason the hacker got off had nothing to do with him having Aspergers Syndrome.  It makes me wonder if there giving the Autistic Community a black eye in order to further sensationalize there story.

Both crown lawyer Ross Douch and defence lawyer Tony Balme told the court that New Zealand police were interested in using Walker’s skills on the right side of the law.

And the only time Autism or Aspergers was ever mentioned in the article was

She also ordered Walker - who has Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of Autism - to hand over his computer-related assets to police.

This story could of been easily titled Hacker Escapes Penalty, or Hacker ‘Akill’ Escapes Penality, or even Walker Escapes Penalty For Hacking - so why the Autism added to the story?  I sent the following to the editor of the orrignating newspaper

I’m writing to you concerning an article your paper published on Mr. Walker an 18 year old hacker who escaped conviction for computer crimes.  I’m  bit concerned on how your paper is choosing to portray this news.  The Article was titled ‘Autistic Hacker Escapes Penalty’ but according to your story the reason the individual escaped conviction was because law enforcement was interested in working with him on the right side of the law.  My concern is why you decided to put the word Autistic in the title and mention Aspergers Syndrome in the article when it was completely irrelevant to the story.

 

I’m willing to guess the reason is you choose to further sensationalize your story - as someone with Aspergers Syndrome this offends me.  Your using the name of a condition to to further your story, which causes misconceptions and hardships for Autistic People around the world

 

Zachary Lassiter

http://www.aspieweb.net

I hope for some form of response.