The US Court of Appeals has upheld a lower courts ruling that there is no long between childhood vaccinations and autism. 
In Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services the court ruled that there was no reason to overule the lower court. According to The Blog of Legal Times:
Judge Timothy Dyk, writing for a three-judge federal circuit panel, said that “Michelle’s development was indeed very abnormal,” but not right after the vaccine was administered. Much of the ruling deals with the scientific evidence offered by both sides in the lengthy proceeding before the special master. Dyk said the government’s failure to seek documentation of one expert’s findings was “troubling,” but “does not justify reversal.”
So now the link between vaccines and autism has been scientifically proven false, legally proven false…. what else needs to happen to put this to rest?
Related Posts |