<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/</link>
	<description>The Aspergers And Autism Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14153</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14153</guid>
		<description>So they say anyway, but guardianship is very hard to repeal. Trust me, I&#039;ve discussed this with laywers for when my consumers have questions about it. Not that it&#039;s impossible, but it is a very hard process to get it repealed. The key would be a very good lawyer! Unless there were stipulations put in place for the guardianship to fade out that is. Or if it&#039;s only a parital guardianship.

I&#039;m not telling you or Kate that it&#039;s impossible, I imagine it can be done. I&#039;m just preparing you for the right pain in the ass it is going to be. And court lawyers are notorious for airing all your dirty laundry if her state appointed guardian chooses to fight against her regaining guardianship over herself. It&#039;s a sticky situaction. I would talk to your P&amp;A about it.

I would also ask what rights a state appointed guardian has, and how much authority do they have legally. That would be a great help to you. If the guardian starts threatening, you could call his/her bluff that way. And perhaps it&#039;s just me, but I always find that immensly satisfying...... Probably one of the reasons some think I&#039;m cold blooded, lol.

I hope this helps. I&#039;m sorry for the cynicism, but not all is bad. Airing dirty laundry can go both ways, and if this guardian has taken upon his/herself more authority over his/her charge than is given to them legally, well, they are SOL. 

*hug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they say anyway, but guardianship is very hard to repeal. Trust me, I&#8217;ve discussed this with laywers for when my consumers have questions about it. Not that it&#8217;s impossible, but it is a very hard process to get it repealed. The key would be a very good lawyer! Unless there were stipulations put in place for the guardianship to fade out that is. Or if it&#8217;s only a parital guardianship.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not telling you or Kate that it&#8217;s impossible, I imagine it can be done. I&#8217;m just preparing you for the right pain in the ass it is going to be. And court lawyers are notorious for airing all your dirty laundry if her state appointed guardian chooses to fight against her regaining guardianship over herself. It&#8217;s a sticky situaction. I would talk to your P&amp;A about it.</p>
<p>I would also ask what rights a state appointed guardian has, and how much authority do they have legally. That would be a great help to you. If the guardian starts threatening, you could call his/her bluff that way. And perhaps it&#8217;s just me, but I always find that immensly satisfying&#8230;&#8230; Probably one of the reasons some think I&#8217;m cold blooded, lol.</p>
<p>I hope this helps. I&#8217;m sorry for the cynicism, but not all is bad. Airing dirty laundry can go both ways, and if this guardian has taken upon his/herself more authority over his/her charge than is given to them legally, well, they are SOL. </p>
<p>*hug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14151</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14151</guid>
		<description>The goal is always for a person to be independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal is always for a person to be independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lurking Aspie</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14149</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lurking Aspie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14149</guid>
		<description>That is true.  

Just curious (and if you&#039;d rather not answer that&#039;s fine, I don&#039;t want to pry), is the guardianship supposed to be a permanent thing for Kate?

If the goal is for Katelyn to one day be independent and her own guardian, then presumably you would only have to worry about boat rocking while the guardianship is in effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true.  </p>
<p>Just curious (and if you&#8217;d rather not answer that&#8217;s fine, I don&#8217;t want to pry), is the guardianship supposed to be a permanent thing for Kate?</p>
<p>If the goal is for Katelyn to one day be independent and her own guardian, then presumably you would only have to worry about boat rocking while the guardianship is in effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14147</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14147</guid>
		<description>The other question is whether I want to risk &quot;rocking the boat&quot; with Kate&#039;s guardian.  She can decide that Kate will not be allowed to live with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other question is whether I want to risk &#8220;rocking the boat&#8221; with Kate&#8217;s guardian.  She can decide that Kate will not be allowed to live with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lurking Aspie</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14146</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lurking Aspie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14146</guid>
		<description>I was just doing a bit of googling about Michigan&#039;s guardianship laws and came up with this:
http://courts.co.calhoun.mi.us/book037a.htm#TABLE%20OF%20CONTENTS

I skimmed through, so could have missed something, but I was looking for something that might state or imply that a guardian may deny the client&#039;s access to someone the client may wish to communicate with.  I could have missed something, but I didn&#039;t find anything that would indicate that it would be within the guardian&#039;s scope of authority.  

In fact, I did pay attention to the &#039;marriage and divorce&#039; section.  While someone under the care of a guardian was at one point not allowed to marry, that statute was repealed and the guardian must petition the court for authority to prevent marriage.  

So unless Kate&#039;s guardian has petitioned the court for said authority, it seems like it would stand to reason that she couldn&#039;t be barred from contact with her fiance.  It does leave me kind of scratching my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just doing a bit of googling about Michigan&#8217;s guardianship laws and came up with this:<br />
<a href="http://courts.co.calhoun.mi.us/book037a.htm#TABLE%20OF%20CONTENTS" rel="nofollow">http://courts.co.calhoun.mi.us/book037a.htm#TABLE%20OF%20CONTENTS</a></p>
<p>I skimmed through, so could have missed something, but I was looking for something that might state or imply that a guardian may deny the client&#8217;s access to someone the client may wish to communicate with.  I could have missed something, but I didn&#8217;t find anything that would indicate that it would be within the guardian&#8217;s scope of authority.  </p>
<p>In fact, I did pay attention to the &#8216;marriage and divorce&#8217; section.  While someone under the care of a guardian was at one point not allowed to marry, that statute was repealed and the guardian must petition the court for authority to prevent marriage.  </p>
<p>So unless Kate&#8217;s guardian has petitioned the court for said authority, it seems like it would stand to reason that she couldn&#8217;t be barred from contact with her fiance.  It does leave me kind of scratching my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand it either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand it either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14144</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14144</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t get a restraining order because someone sent someone flowers.  A deputy sheriff that is familiar with Kate and I&#039;s situation told me that if she was called because I sent Kate flowers she would pissed as its a waste of her time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t get a restraining order because someone sent someone flowers.  A deputy sheriff that is familiar with Kate and I&#8217;s situation told me that if she was called because I sent Kate flowers she would pissed as its a waste of her time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14142</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14142</guid>
		<description>So that is where I get confused.  How does someone&#039;s guardian get to chose who she talks to?  I understand she can&#039;t sign contracts or whatnot.  But phone calls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that is where I get confused.  How does someone&#8217;s guardian get to chose who she talks to?  I understand she can&#8217;t sign contracts or whatnot.  But phone calls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14141</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14141</guid>
		<description>Kate has not asked for &#039;no contact&#039;.  Her guardian however is demanding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate has not asked for &#8216;no contact&#8217;.  Her guardian however is demanding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.aspieweb.net/a-risk/#comment-14140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspieweb.net/?p=1465#comment-14140</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I seem to be sounding like a broken record.  Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I seem to be sounding like a broken record.  Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

